Skip to content
Evidence and accountability

What our evidence can tell you

A screenshot, a growth percentage and a calculator estimate answer different questions. Our method keeps those differences visible: every claim is classified, matched to the strongest available source and dated, so you can evaluate a service on the right evidence.

At a glance

Source hierarchy
Platform → regulator → press → own data
Historical examples
Aura-managed accounts
Comparisons
Public sources with dates

The source hierarchy we follow

When a claim needs evidence, we work down this hierarchy until a source class can support it. A lower tier never overrides a higher one: a marketing screenshot does not outrank platform terms, and platform terms do not outrank a regulator.

Source hierarchy, strongest authority first
PrioritySource classWhat we use it forExamples we cite
1Platform terms and official help documentationWhat a platform permits, how a feature works, current account and payout rulesOnlyFans Terms of Service; official platform support and help centers
2Government and regulator sourcesLegal, tax and advertising-claim standardsFTC guidance (earnings claims, endorsements), IRS guidance for self-employed and gig income, eCFR, legislation.gov.uk, Companies House
3Major news outletsFact-checking a company claim, an industry event or a public statisticEstablished outlets, linked at the exact point a fact depends on them
4Aura’s own account recordsResults from accounts we actually manage, always labeled Aura-reportedThe anonymized records on /creator-results and the scale facts on /about

How a claim is verified, step by step

Every checkable sentence in our guides passes through the same sequence before it publishes and again at each review.

The verification sequence
StepWhat happens
1Locate the claim: identify the exact sentence that depends on an external fact rather than on our own operating advice.
2Classify it: platform rule, legal or tax statement, a competitor’s published offer, an Aura performance figure, or a general industry number.
3Match the required source class for that claim type, as set out in our editorial policy.
4Link the primary source at the point of use — the regulator’s or platform’s own page, never only a summary of it.
5Record what the source establishes and the date it was reviewed on the page.
6Re-check at the page’s next review date, or immediately when a reader reports a change through our corrections route.

Read historical results with their limits

Our results page presents anonymized records from managed accounts. They establish the existence of the displayed history, not a promise, a controlled experiment or the full distribution of every creator’s outcome.

  • Ask for the time period, source, calculation and cohort behind an average.
  • An exceptional account does not establish the minimum or typical result.
  • A platform leaderboard describes that leaderboard; it is not an independent audit of all agencies.

Keep research separate from recommendation

Competitor comparisons cite what the agency publicly says it offers and record the review date. We have not tested competitors’ private operations. Missing information is marked as unknown rather than treated as an absent service.

  • Aura is the publisher and a commercial participant in agency comparisons.
  • Exact fees, exit terms and service scope must be checked in a written proposal.
  • We do not assign fabricated ratings or treat unsupported revenue claims as verified evidence.

What happens when a source changes

Platform rules, regulator pages and agency websites all change. When a scheduled re-check or a reader report shows that a cited source has moved, changed or disappeared, the claim does not survive on the old citation: we re-verify against the source’s current page, replace the link, or remove the claim in the next revision.

  • Time-sensitive proof such as our Infloww rank is updated when the underlying leaderboard changes, and the page says when it was checked.
  • If a source can no longer be confirmed, the claim is either re-anchored to a current official source or dropped.
  • A revision that changes what a page says moves its review date; a re-check that changes nothing does not.

Review dates are a discipline, not decoration

A reviewed or updated date on our pages reflects a substantive check of the content against its sources — never a cosmetic refresh. Sitemaps carry the date of the last meaningful change for the same reason: the date is a signal a reader can act on, so we keep it honest on both the page and in the sitemap entry.

Worked example: one claim, verified end to end

Here is a real claim from our library with its full verification trail, so you can see the method working rather than trust a description of it.

Verification trail for one published claim
FieldRecord
The claim“The FTC advises that earnings claims should be supported rather than based on unusually successful examples.” — /learn/how-much-do-onlyfans-agencies-take
Claim typeRegulatory guidance on advertising and earnings claims
Required source classGovernment regulator (priority 2 in the hierarchy above)
Source usedFTC business guidance on substantiating earnings claims — https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2026/06/back-those-earnings-claims-other-lessons-ftcs-labor-task-force-work
What the source establishesThe FTC’s position that unusually successful examples should not be presented as typical earnings claims — which is why our own results pages label Aura-reported averages instead of showcasing a best case.
Verification trailThe citation lives in the guide’s source list, recorded with the note “Why unusually successful examples should not be presented as typical”. The citation and its note were verified in the article record on 2026-10-21; readers can confirm the current FTC text at the link. The same standard appears in our results publication rules.

Sources and review dates

The source owner’s pages establish its published guidance or offer, not an independent verification of results. Terms can change; check the current source and your account agreement.

Start with your account, not someone else’s results

Tell Aura about your audience, schedule and goals. We will review where support could help and discuss the scope before you make a commitment.

Apply